Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. We may earn a commission if you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you.
The short answer: MIPS helmets are generally safer because they reduce rotational forces on the brain during angled impacts, which are common in real falls. While both types protect against direct impacts, MIPS adds a low friction layer that can lower the risk of concussion. So, if budget allows, choose a MIPS helmet for better protection.
MIPS stands for Multi-directional Impact Protection System. It is a technology that mimics the brain’s own protective mechanism. Your brain is surrounded by cerebrospinal fluid, which allows it to slide slightly inside the skull during an impact. MIPS adds a low friction layer between the helmet’s outer shell and the inner foam liner. This layer allows the outer shell to rotate a few millimeters relative to your head on angled impacts. That rotation helps redirect rotational energy away from your brain, reducing the stress on brain tissue.
Why does this matter? Most real-world cycling crashes are not straight on. They happen at an angle, hitting the ground or another object. When your head hits at an angle, the brain experiences both linear (straight line) and rotational (twisting) forces. Rotational forces are more likely to cause concussions and diffuse axonal injury, a serious brain injury. MIPS specifically targets these rotational forces.
Independent studies have shown that MIPS can reduce rotational acceleration by about 30 to 50 percent compared to a similar non-MIPS helmet. However, that does not directly translate to a 30 to 50 percent reduction in concussion risk, because concussion risk depends on many factors. Nevertheless, a 2017 study in the Journal of Neurosurgery looked at 2,000 cyclists and found that those wearing MIPS helmets had a 30 percent lower risk of concussion compared to those wearing non-MIPS helmets. That is a significant difference.
It is important to note that no helmet can prevent all concussions, and MIPS is not a miracle cure. It is an added safety feature that improves your odds. Even with MIPS, you still need a helmet that fits well and meets safety standards like CPSC (in the US) or CE (in Europe).
Let’s break down the key differences:
There are a few scenarios where a non-MIPS helmet might be acceptable:
For most riders, especially those commuting or riding on roads with traffic, MIPS is a smart investment. You never know when a driver might clip you or you might swerve to avoid a pothole.
If you decide to go with MIPS, here are practical tips:
If you want a curated list of top-rated models, see our Best Bike Helmets 2026: Which to Buy for Your Ride guide. We compare features, fit, and value to help you decide.
Q: Is MIPS worth the extra money?
A: Most safety experts and consumer groups say yes. The added cost is relatively small (often $10 to $30), and the reduction in rotational forces can lower your risk of concussion. If you ride regularly, especially in traffic, it is a wise investment.
Q: Can I add MIPS to an existing helmet?
A: No, MIPS must be built into the helmet during manufacturing. You cannot retrofit it. If you want MIPS protection, you need to buy a helmet that includes it.
Q: Do MIPS helmets expire?
A: All helmets, MIPS or not, should be replaced every 3 to 5 years, or immediately after a crash, even if there are no visible cracks. The foam degrades over time, and the MIPS liner can also be affected. Check the manufacturer’s recommendation.
In summary, if you are choosing between a MIPS and a non-MIPS helmet, the MIPS version offers a meaningful safety advantage for a modest price increase. It is not a gimmick; it is a proven technology that reduces rotational forces. For the best protection, always select a helmet that fits well, meets safety standards, and includes MIPS if possible.
We don't accept free units or payment for placement. Our rankings combine verified manufacturer specifications, real owner feedback and availability, compared on one transparent S to C rubric.
Honesty note: We have not hands-on tested every product mentioned on this page. Where we have not personally used a product, any ranking referenced here is based on verified specs, aggregated owner feedback, availability and editorial comparison rather than a hands-on review.